We must recognize that some had minimized the current organization and its ability walker political power has become more clear now. No doubt there are interests that are perceived to Sendero Luminoso (SL) in a magnitude higher than real, but that should not lead to a contemplative persist in the matter. The truth is that SL now aims to compete electorally and under certain facades disguise. This would happen, those convicted of terrorism at some point should be released, the matter is that the condemnations of 1992 to eighteen, twenty and twenty-five years it seemed they would never end, but the dates are already present. Does SL right to participate from the law in national politics?
That response is directly related to its ideology and methods that stem from it. Everything indicates that the ideology hiker, who like all fundamentalism is attributed to own revealed truth, is still intact. Applied terrorist methods now give way to a killer tactic does not mean that fundamentalism is shelved. Reading the statements of members of SL on the Internet and other means, it is clear that assume a military defeat but not politics, which means that at some point there will be new conditions for the resumption of the war popular.
And the issue with SL now is, basically, if everything comes into view this week favor Fujimori, right or other interests, the issue is that the fight against SL is independent of the above and unfortunately it can favor undesirable political actors, but this not be a reason for postponing the necessary fight against fundamentalism (such as counter shaft to freedom and the right) and its various expressions. Approaches do not support fundamentalism half, or may be waived by that one can be closer to our idea of \u200b\u200bthe policy are just such and never vary. Against them can not apply the criteria to which are attached the other social actors, but naked in his totalitarian pretensions.
is clear that the issue has been using SL to overshadow other issues such as the indiscriminate delivery of natural resources without which Peru is favored, the postponed reforms, corruption that reaches the very top leadership, and a long list topics slopes that do persist to a logic in which the rights are not universal but only for some. It would be wrong not to hide behind that to see that perhaps the organization has caused more damage to the country (especially the basic social fabric and by caricaturing the socialist proposal) has not abandoned its essence and so seeks to infiltrate back into any space delivered to you, or others who favor relativizing his presence. Confronting
SL involves analyzing not only their thinking, to condemn his actions and seek to bare their totalitarianism, also goes by fairly ask why the only Latin American country in which an organization born of these features is Peru. This sequential historical, social and economic results in the formation of the country as we know it into the second half of last century, is driving the emergence of an ossified thinking, which nevertheless manages to be the creek in several conscience and makes like no other on the ropes to the State. This search for explanation (not justification) is latent, because despite the unjustified and called insanity of SL, some young people today are attracted to this radical, which is not a radical one that leads to social development proposal, but is the negation of everything because nothing out of the light Gonzales can be worth maintained. They
reason those who report that they are trying to establish legal measures restricting the political participation of SL or other group which would limit its actions, because the regulation serves only to those who are governed by their rules, as in many other situations we have no strategy to guide us against the legitimate claims and electoral SL. This group does not need rules to follow or disobey, because not to believe in the democratic system (weak and conditioned, manipulated and relative), despises society and their relations, to which must be made to see the light of right thinking .
Bigger then the challenge of society and leaders of it, to locate the perspective that best allows derail the growth of SL. In good time the debate from the left is taking place, but he has again two visions: to prioritize the confrontation with SL because it is absolutely necessary, qualify the presence and organization of SL because it favors the interests behind benefit. Indicated it would strike a balance between the two, but in this as in so many other things, there is no agreement and will be favored to the right.
The organized left and the population that identifies itself with socialist approaches, should remember that SL is the biggest damage has been inflicted on the possibility of socialism is a major player in the political process from 1983 to Peru, because coming from the left (or at least be related in some issues with it) is relatively easy to create the partnership proposed by the hegemonic power that has created the sense common to left and SL are related or hands are distant cousins. In fact, there is no clear answer what to do now to finish to beat SL, but it is perceived that one of these actions is not necessary to relativize their presence and intentions, so that temporarily bring water to another mill. Alexandro
Saco
June 28 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment